近现代的中国有过世界第一GDP,但人均GDP基本上没有达到过世界平均数,直到这10多年。人均GDP从来就没有世界第一,
拜中国的大一统和一战前的殖民状况,百年前的中国真的是个庞然大物,但是大而不强。
1. 早在 1820 年,中国是迄今为止世界上最大的经济体。
2. 两个世纪前,中国的GDP是当时世界第二大经济体印度的两倍。
3. 1820 年,中国的经济规模是欧洲最大经济体英国的六倍,几乎是刚刚起步的美国 GDP 的 20 倍。
4、按人均计算,1820年中国GDP达到世界平均水平的84%。
5. 到 1870 年,中国的人均 GDP 下降了三分之一——仅为世界平均水平的 60%。
6. 中国经济在 19 世纪下半叶的衰退部分是由于鸦片战争和太平天国运动后中国农田遭到破坏。
7. 随着西方国家从工业革命中变得更加富有,中国在 19 世纪的经济上也失去了优势。
8. 就在 1980 年,中国人均 GDP 仅相当于世界平均水平的 24%。
9. 70 年代后期,邓小平开始实施以市场为基础的改革,这将导致中国的经济现代化。
10. 经过二十年的经济高速增长,2000 年中国人均 GDP 恢复到世界平均水平的 56%,接近 1870 年的水平。
11. 经过三十年的经济改革,到2010年中国人均GDP相当于世界平均水平的103%。
结果 2014 年 10 月,中国超过美国成为世界最大的经济体。
数据来源:格罗宁根大学麦迪逊项目。 全球主义研究中心的分析。
1. Back in 1820, China was by far the world’s largest economy.
2. Two centuries ago, China’s GDP was twice that of India’s, the world’s second-largest economy at the time.
3. In 1820, China’s economy was six times as large as Britain’s, the largest economy in Europe — and almost 20 times the GDP of the still-fledgling United States.
4. On a per capita basis, China’s GDP in 1820 reached 84% of the global average.
5. By 1870, China’s per capita GDP had fallen by one third — to just 60% of the world average.
6. China’s economic decline in the second half of the 19th century was, in part, the result of the devastation of China’s agricultural lands following the Opium Wars and the Taiping Rebellion.
7. China also lost ground economically in the 19th century as Western nations grew wealthier from the Industrial Revolution.
8. As recently as 1980, China’s per capita GDP was equal to just 24% of the world average.
9. In the late 1970s, Deng Xiaoping began to implement market-based reforms that would lead to China’s economic modernization.
10. After two decades of rapid economic growth, China’s per capita GDP in 2000 was back up to 56% of the global average, almost where it stood in 1870.
11. After three decades of economic reforms, by 2010 China’s per capita GDP was equal to 103% of the global average.
The UpshotIn October 2014, China overtook the United States as the world’s largest economy.
Data source: Maddison Project, University of Groningen. Analysis by The Globalist Research Center.
