XBB 更容易传给打过疫苗的?Tweet 太误导人,不同人各取所需,采取不同的理解。

本帖于 2023-01-16 09:35:14 时间, 由普通用户 voiceofme 编辑

https://www.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data-variants.page

NYC health department 在官网上说: It may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or previously had COVID-19 compared to prior variants. 

后来在twitter上,NYC HEALTH 说:may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or already had COVID-19. 这条TWEET产生了很大的误解。

https://twitter.com/nycHealthy/status/1613913360352903171?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1613913360352903171%7Ctwgr%5Eb0aaba8f0a5d59ccd6073538fba87c07cefe68df%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fhealth%2Fomicron-subvariant-xbb-1-5-possibly-more-likely-infect-vaccinated-officials-say

 

 

根据这样的信息,FOXNEWS, 和 epoch times说:“Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 possibly more likely to infect those who are vaccinated, officials say”

https://www.foxnews.com/health/omicron-subvariant-xbb-1-5-possibly-more-likely-infect-vaccinated-officials-say

 

WXC 网友说:“纽约市卫生官员说,XBB.1.5 更容易感染已经接种疫苗的人”

但NBC NYC 说的全面:“NYC health officials say XBB.1.5 may be more likely than other variants to infect vaccinated people and people who already had COVID”。 

为什么有人要故意省略掉最基本的比较信息:XBB变种容易传染给打过疫苗的人,比较的是和前面的变种。 省略掉比较的对象让人产生错觉,认为比较的是没有打过疫苗的人,从而认为打疫苗没有用,反而有害。这种误导有有意,也有无意的,但由此看出,Tweet用很短的篇幅来说一个叫复杂的事情,常常成为了误导的根源。

 

 

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!