XBB 更容易传给打过疫苗的？Tweet 太误导人，不同人各取所需，采取不同的理解。

https://www.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data-variants.page

NYC health department 在官网上说： It may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or previously had COVID-19 compared to prior variants. 

后来在twitter上，NYC HEALTH 说：may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or already had COVID-19. 这条TWEET产生了很大的误解。

https://twitter.com/nycHealthy/status/1613913360352903171?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1613913360352903171%7Ctwgr%5Eb0aaba8f0a5d59ccd6073538fba87c07cefe68df%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fhealth%2Fomicron-subvariant-xbb-1-5-possibly-more-likely-infect-vaccinated-officials-say

 

 

根据这样的信息，FOXNEWS， 和 epoch times说：“Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 possibly more likely to infect those who are vaccinated, officials say”

https://www.foxnews.com/health/omicron-subvariant-xbb-1-5-possibly-more-likely-infect-vaccinated-officials-say

 

WXC 网友说：“纽约市卫生官员说，XBB.1.5 更容易感染已经接种疫苗的人”

但NBC NYC 说的全面：“NYC health officials say XBB.1.5 may be more likely than other variants to infect vaccinated people and people who already had COVID”。 

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/health/covid-variant-xbb-1-5-prompts-nyc-health-department-update/4046083/ 

为什么有人要故意省略掉最基本的比较信息：XBB变种容易传染给打过疫苗的人，比较的是和前面的变种。 省略掉比较的对象让人产生错觉，认为比较的是没有打过疫苗的人，从而认为打疫苗没有用，反而有害。这种误导有有意，也有无意的，但由此看出，Tweet用很短的篇幅来说一个叫复杂的事情，常常成为了误导的根源。

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 就算结论是XBB变种和前面的变种比较更容易传染给打过疫苗的人，是不是也要有没打过疫苗的做对照组？ -远阡- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 09:52:47

• 肯定是做过对比才说这个结论的吧。多次注射疫苗后，人体的自身免疫力降低，也是医学界认同的说法 -547788- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 10:25:09

• 俺当时看到没有误解啊。 因为纽约找不到没有阳过的 -波段王- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 09:56:17