Agree! US legal field is very efficient. If you have case agains

deep pockets like CNN, you do not need to advertise for lawyers. They will line up for your case.

So get over with. You do not have case. Still feeling hurt by the words of Cafferty's? next time try not to trust too much your English taught by your Chinese teacher. There are a lot of more about English outside English teaching in your Chinese classroom.

The term "Goons and thugs" do not have any implications of race, ethnicity, religion and others that have been defined in US discrimination laws. Oh, you think it does, you think wrong.

Want to learn the true meaning of "goons and thugs"? Just take a look how some of those chinese 城管 patrol the street and "keep" the peace. They fit the term perfectly


所有跟帖: 

哎,这他招牌来着...转贴大字报连发或者二流英文糊弄人 -realrockyboy- 给 realrockyboy 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2008 postreply 19:37:13

Not suck enough to confuse the term "goons and thugs" -baiwen- 给 baiwen 发送悄悄话 baiwen 的博客首页 (286 bytes) () 05/10/2008 postreply 19:49:47

回复:Not suck enough to confuse the term "goons and thugs" -realrockyboy- 给 realrockyboy 发送悄悄话 (113 bytes) () 05/10/2008 postreply 20:38:35

"cnn那个主持人是SB“,我认为该论断并不涉及年龄,性别和种族 -牛B2008- 给 牛B2008 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2008 postreply 07:16:45

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!