二氧化碳是温室气体--这一点有的争辩吗？（在同等条件下）温室气体的增多(从280ppm升到 415ppm)，效果是什么？ 难道不是暖化？ 是谁对科学clueless? 你整天拿智商说事，你自己的智商有五十几？
二， 如果这不能说服你的话，请看wikipedia对Dyson 的立场的描述。
Dyson agrees that anthropogenic global warming exists and that one of its main causes is the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the burning of fossil fuels.[60] He has said that in many ways increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is beneficial,[61] and that it is increasing biological growth, agricultural yields and forests.[62] He believes that existing simulation models of climate change fail to account for some important factors, and that the results thus contain too great a margin of error to reliably predict future trends.[60][63]
另外， 除了Dyson的立场，你对我提出的直接证据，有丝毫的回应了能力吗？到底是谁Clueless?
• Global Warming: It comes from data adjustments - tibuko - 
(251 bytes) (2092 reads) 12/01/2019 06:05:48
• 第一, 这个结论与你的前面这个贴是矛盾的, 再一次例证 (1) Climate Denier 没有自己的数据,研究与立论. - SwiperTheFox - (2456 bytes) (29 reads) 12/01/2019 07:06:39
• You are so clueless, Dyson's assertion is CO2 makes the planet g - tibuko - (230
