‘Arbitrary Determination’ Eswar Prasad, an economist at Cornell University who worked in the IMF’s China division, said China still doesn’t meet Treasury’s technical criteria for manipulation. Countries are measured for manipulation based on their trade deficits with the U.S., their histories of intervention and their current-account balances. “Treasury has made what seems like an arbitrary determination of currency manipulation since China hardly meets all of the relevant criteria and despite the dilution of those criteria over time,” Prasad said. The Treasury statement cited the PBOC’s own statement on Monday as evidence that China was controlling its exchange rate. Stating that it would take measures to stabilize market expectations, and alluding to tools it had developed, was “an open acknowledgment by the PBOC that it has extensive experience manipulating its currency and remains prepared to do so on an ongoing basis,” the U.S. Treasury said. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-05/u-s-treasury-department-labels-china-a-currency-manipulator?srnd=markets-vp |
一个充满偏执狂的政府竟然为了人民币贬值破7的心里关口匆忙宣布中国为汇率操纵国
所有跟帖:
• 怎样的标准,怎样的程序,有证据吗? -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 19:23:31
• 不会读英文? -fourwaves- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 19:25:59
• 蠢豬扮懵虎 -老而北小酒虫- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 21:06:44
• 日本自2012年以来已经贬值31%了,从而刺激了出口,所谓安倍经济学 -manyworlds- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 22:57:00
• 如果中国不干预汇率,1:10或更高。那他到哪里收税? -4fun9999- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 19:53:17
• 算是履行竞选口号,一切为了连任,哪管洪水滔滔。 -John_sh- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 19:54:14
• 而美联储减息去影响汇率不叫操纵汇率,只能说是影响了汇率。 -4fun9999- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 19:54:35
• 我觉得还是应该用冷战的思维看这个问题: -Peaceview- ♂ (827 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 20:02:14
• 有见地,赞 -大司空- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 20:28:02
• 美国还有良知的人吗? -fourwaves- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 20:35:11
• 对的,对美国来说这是能否继续做老大还是很快被中国赶出西太的问题。站在美国的立场上,此时不搏更待何时? -刁小山- ♀ (662 bytes) () 08/05/2019 postreply 22:22:27