注意这一段

来源: 王伍 2018-12-10 11:49:20 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1258 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 王伍 ] 在 2018-12-10 11:50:55 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
回答: 加拿大法学教授的一篇关于孟的文章王伍2018-12-10 11:42:57

At the moment it appears that the basis of the U.S. case is fraud and conspiracy to defraud, with some relation to breach of sanctions. Fraud offences are known to Canadian law, and under our Special Economic Measures Act, it is an offence to have economic dealings with foreign states against which the government has issued sanctions, and Iran is one of the listed states. While this may be a parallel to the relevant U.S. laws, one important difference is that Canada’s law is not applied against foreign nationals who act outside Canada, whereas it appears the U.S. is pursuing Ms. Meng for conduct that did not touch American territory. Moreover, sanctions are as much a tool of foreign policy as they are a form of regulation, and an extradition case on this basis will be breaking new ground, and courting uncertainty.

所有跟帖: 

其实,如果法官真的是有主权国家的法官,那早就把案子扔出法庭了。逮捕孟女士是用的 -thetruth111- 给 thetruth111 发送悄悄话 (634 bytes) () 12/10/2018 postreply 11:59:51

看到时候的庭审吧 -王伍- 给 王伍 发送悄悄话 (367 bytes) () 12/10/2018 postreply 12:10:53

法学教授的看法很精辟! -yzout- 给 yzout 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/10/2018 postreply 12:59:12

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”