DEI,一种历史的修正,给有“Merit”但被剥夺机会的人一个运用“Merit”的机会。

转帖,Smithsonian 的原文,说的是美国军队内对“女兵”加入一线飞行作战的事件描述。题目就是“On Their Merit…….”   但是,历史的说,她们所拥有的“Merit”不被接受,包括如下一段:

Reactions to the arrival of women in combat aviation roles was mixed. Dyson was the first to arrive on the Eisenhower, and she recalled her commanding officer’s greeting: “Look, I didn’t ask for you. I didn’t want you, but I’m stuck with you. So don’t [mess] up.”

文章标题:On Their Merit: The First American Women to Fly in Combat

文章链接:On Their Merit: The First American Women to Fly in Combat | Smithsonian American Women's History Museum

全文见下:

In two seconds, the massive F/A-18C Hornet went from sitting still to roaring past 160 miles per hour as it launched off the deck of the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69). It was two years into Operation Southern Watch—the U.S.-led effort to enforce no-fly and no-drive zones in Iraq during the aftermath of the 1991 Persian Gulf War. During that time, hundreds of American aircraft had been regularly flying in that dangerous environment, but one of the Hornets that launched on November 15, 1994, was different: a woman was at the controls.

U.S. Navy Lieutenant Kimberly “Face” Dyson became the first American woman to officially fly a combat mission that day. “We were ready to do anything,” Dyson recalled when interviewed almost thirty years later. “It was a little nerve-racking. But in the end, it turned out to be a normal flight, very much the same as we had done in practice.”

Dyson was not alone. She served with fellow F/A-18 pilots Lieutenant Sharon “Pinto” Deegan (Cummings at the time) and Lieutenant Junior Grade Joy “Trigger” Dean (Adams at the time), E-2C Hawkeye pilot Lieutenant Lisa “KP” Kirkpatrick, and Sikorsky SH-3 helicopter pilot Lieutenant Lynne Fowler. They all flew combat missions on that same cruise from the Eisenhower, the first U.S. aircraft carrier to deploy with a gender-integrated crew. They continued flying combat missions into 1995 as part of Operation Deny Flight in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

None of these women intended to achieve such milestones. “I didn’t feel any weight of history,” Dean noted. “We wanted to put our heads down. We wanted to work. We wanted to do the mission.” Like many military pilots before them, most of these women had joined out of a love of flying, attracted to the challenge of carrier aviation. Dean’s father was in the Air Force, and she saw the Navy as her chance to fly: “The Navy, they were letting women fly jets. Not deploying, obviously, but letting them fly aggressors.” Deegan’s motivation was simple but powerful: “I just wanted to fly jets.” Kirkpatrick recalled: “I just wanted a tailhook, that was all I wanted. Flying in naval aviation off the ship is probably the most challenging thing you can do.”

When Dyson, Dean, Deegan, and Kirkpatrick had joined the Navy, the U.S. Department of Defense still held to the “combat exclusion law,” a policy that banned women from flying combat missions. After years of activism both internal and external to the military, as well as several public events that brought the issue of gender discrimination to a public debate, the law was repealed in 1991. In the Spring of 1993, all the military services began assigning women to combat aviation roles.

Reactions to the arrival of women in combat aviation roles was mixed. Dyson was the first to arrive on the Eisenhower, and she recalled her commanding officer’s greeting: “Look, I didn’t ask for you. I didn’t want you, but I’m stuck with you. So don’t [mess] up.” Not everyone felt this way—Dyson said that about half of her male shipmates had no problem with women crew members.

What really normalized the presence of women was the test of carrier flight operations. Gender mattered less than being a good pilot. “If you were a good stick, you were a good stick,” Dyson said, “and they couldn’t take that away from you.” “We became a pretty cohesive unit,” Kirkpatrick added. “The Eisenhower by the end was just used to women on board—we figured it out. There were problems, yes, there were issues. But at some point, it just wasn’t a thing.”

Flying in high-threat areas over Iraq and Bosnia, these women took on the same risks—with the same enthusiasm—as any other fighter pilot in combat. Deegan wrote a letter home, describing her first combat mission, the day after Dyson’s: “I was in a strike package that flew right over an active SAM (surface-to-air missile) site; directly into the heart of its envelope. It’s almost as if we were trying to pick a fight.” Dyson recalled that the missions in Bosnia were more dangerous: “Those were the ones where they were actually shooting at us.” She flew a particularly dangerous mission in which “I was a decoy for a SAM site.” This required her to fly over a SAM launch site to activate its tracking radar so that EA-6B Prowlers flying behind her could attack the site with anti-radiation missiles. “I wasn’t thrilled with that one,” she said. Dean remembered how she felt just before that campaign began: “It’s going to be my time—I’m going to get to do something.” Kirkpatrick faced a difficult situation flying the Hawkeye: “We couldn’t eject in the E-2,” says Kirkpatrick. “If we were hit by a missile, we were never getting out of that airplane.” Despite the dangers, Deegan recalled that the missions during Deny Flight “were a lot more fun.”

These women proved that being a good combat pilot has nothing to do with one’s gender. Their efforts set the foundation for many women that have come after them in the years since.  More than anything, these women were proud that the presence of women aircrews soon became normal and unremarkable. They were pilots—not regarded as different because they were women. As Dean put it: “I wanted to be judged on my merit, and if I was judged on my merit, then we’d be good to go. And we were.”

 

后注:女性可以从军但是不能“实战”的硬性规定是1948年起实施的。至1993年结束。但是,“结束”了并不代表女性可以无阻的在军中获得平等待遇。任何相关的 DEI 规定,有关在军中提升女性地位的,都是对那个女性实战禁令的修正与补偿。这种修正与补偿,现在经历的“进行时”待遇可以是这样的:

美利坚合众国在2025年。

 

所有跟帖: 

这样啊我说怎么下面OS吞吞吐吐的让我看不懂呢那没事了那我可以回你一个。等今天下班上完课吧 -donau- 给 donau 发送悄悄话 donau 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/15/2025 postreply 23:11:02

不急。这个话题,事涉“人生态度”,可以说很久。慢慢道来,^_^。donau 周三开心。 -文革传人- 给 文革传人 发送悄悄话 文革传人 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 23:43:48

几个女人可以打过男人,不代表男女没有差别 -ahhhh- 给 ahhhh 发送悄悄话 (166 bytes) () 09/15/2025 postreply 23:11:48

今年1月里根机场直升机撞客机,当时的女驾驶员飞行时间只有450个小时,达不到军用飞机飞行员的资格。 -Shubin- 给 Shubin 发送悄悄话 Shubin 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 06:54:18

关键是,谁工作质量更好,就该给谁去做,而不是考虑其它因素。因为DEI选了水平稍差的人,差距导致重大损失,这个责任谁来负? -咲媱- 给 咲媱 发送悄悄话 咲媱 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 05:36:38

难道被服务的人的利益,就不用考虑? 比如你病了,你是考虑一个DEI公平的医生,还是不考虑DEI只考虑水平的医生给你手术? -咲媱- 给 咲媱 发送悄悄话 咲媱 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 05:50:42

是,在1948年至1993年间,许多应该有资格的“高水平女性飞行员”不得为军队服务之门而入,------ -文革传人- 给 文革传人 发送悄悄话 文革传人 的博客首页 (75 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 23:47:11

所以应该性别种族盲人,只看水平。这样才能避免你说的这种情况,而不是DEI -咲媱- 给 咲媱 发送悄悄话 咲媱 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/17/2025 postreply 05:58:20

传人的盲点在于DEI是对Merit的改进,把Merit 执行中的一些问题认为是Merit 本身的问题。 -QualityWithoutName- 给 QualityWithoutName 发送悄悄话 QualityWithoutName 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 08:18:46

事实是DEI 是对Merit 至上的抛弃,我们不能因为Merit 执行中的一些问题而抛弃这一基本理念,而是应该改进执行。 -QualityWithoutName- 给 QualityWithoutName 发送悄悄话 QualityWithoutName 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 08:23:03

私人企业可以有自己的标准,“官方”的“Merit”都是人定的,你认为此刻的川版“Merit”如何?---- -文革传人- 给 文革传人 发送悄悄话 文革传人 的博客首页 (248 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 23:53:44

这是宪法赋予总统的权力,三权分立中的行政,宪法规定总统可以提名自己的内阁,是为了保证总统有一个有力有效的团队。 -QualityWithoutName- 给 QualityWithoutName 发送悄悄话 QualityWithoutName 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/17/2025 postreply 04:58:39

四年之后,选民不喜欢的话,可以叫他走人。美国出了很多有名的总统,得益于这种行政权一个人总管的设计 -QualityWithoutName- 给 QualityWithoutName 发送悄悄话 QualityWithoutName 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/17/2025 postreply 05:03:56

谢谢传人兄回复。在反对极权上我们是一致的。我是宪法主义,只要遵从宪法,美国个人极权是不可能的。 -QualityWithoutName- 给 QualityWithoutName 发送悄悄话 QualityWithoutName 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/17/2025 postreply 05:08:38

教主和“masculinity”是 homoousios,这已经是家喻户晓的事实,不下令 erase 历史才算奇怪:-) -papyrus- 给 papyrus 发送悄悄话 (1563 bytes) () 09/16/2025 postreply 12:40:11

再谢古纸兄的文化渗透,世界报的文章可读至不可读处为止,^_^。其中的几个“手段”前测完全----- -文革传人- 给 文革传人 发送悄悄话 文革传人 的博客首页 (928 bytes) () 09/17/2025 postreply 00:10:59

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!