“Engrave in Marble”,^_^。再谢古纸兄的文化渗透。普大帝侵略战争的结局与乌克兰永远----

来源: 文革传人 2024-02-26 00:29:15 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (5110 bytes)

脱离俄系的命运已定,只是战争第一年大胜造成的高预期可能给乌克兰人带来了一些此刻的挫折感。还要继续痛苦......希望不是很久。至于美国的援助,会到位,也许有拖延,但会到位。这是一周前共和党大腕 Bill Kristol 写的一篇文章(当然是“RINO",而且是骄傲的一位,*_*):

FEB 19, 2024

Happy Presidents’ Day—a quick missive today, and we’ll let you get back to your holiday.

Hanging Putin Around Trump’s Neck

Not to be a Debbie Downer on Presidents’ Day, but I want to talk about Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

In the last few days, Vladimir Putin has murdered Alexei Navalny, and the New York Times has reported that Putin hopes to deploy anti-satellite weapons with nuclear warheads in space that would pose a clear and present danger to us.

And of course Putin’s brutal war against Ukraine is entering its third year. It’s also clear that Putin is a key figure in an axis of anti-American dictators in Iran, China, and North Korea.

We were slow in awakening to the threat of Putin. We have been sluggish in responding to that threat once awakened. But it is the most urgent foreign policy threat we face.

A broad coalition of political forces in the United States, ranging from Mike Pence on the right to Bernie Sanders on the left, is anti-Putin. Against them stand Donald Trump and some of his acolytes, who are pro-Putin.

The likely nominee of one of our two major political parties is pro-Vladimir Putin. This is an astonishing fact. It is an appalling fact. It has to be a central fact of the 2024 campaign.

But the political professionals say foreign policy doesn’t matter in elections. Americans vote on the economy. Or immigration. Or abortion rights.

That’s true to some degree. But not as much as we might think—particularly now that the post-Cold War era has ended in the wake of Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. The world we now live in seems more like that of 1972, or 1980, or 1988. In such a world, issues of foreign policy and national security matter in selecting a president. Putin matters.

And American voters know who Putin is. In an August Gallup poll, 95 percent of all Americans had an opinion of the Russian dictator, making him better known than any American politicians other than Biden and Trump. In that poll, Trump was seen favorably by 41 percent of Americans and unfavorably by 55 percent, while Biden’s favorable/unfavorable split was 41 percent to 57 percent.

Putin’s numbers in that poll? 5 percent favorable, 90 percent unfavorable. A YouGov poll last week was a bit rosier: 13 percent in favor of the Russian dictator, 81 percent unfavorable.

It’s actually striking that all the work of the pro-Putin right—from Trump himself to Tucker Carlson—has had so little effect in improving Putin’s image. Putin turns out to be a very hard sell.

Which is all the more reason to hang Putin around Trump’s neck. It could well make Trump a harder sell to some number of swing voters.

Those who seek to save the country from a Trump second term can and should hammer home Trump’s fondness for Putin.

A Bush 1988 campaign operative was quoted as saying that they were going to make the American public believe that Willie Horton, the murderer paroled under a law signed by Massachusetts governor Michael Dukakis, was Dukakis’s running mate. They did a pretty good job of that. There is far better justification for making Vladimir Putin into Donald Trump’s figurative running mate. Because it’s true: A vote for Trump is a vote for Putin.

—William Kristol

在美国给大帝作 poodles 没有前景,注定失败。

谢谢介绍西班牙的陈同学,查了一下,纽时2019年有报导:

A Bar for Spain’s Radical Right, Run by a Chinese Immigrant - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

在这家西班牙酒吧,中国老板让独裁者佛朗哥“还魂” - 纽约时报中文网 (nytimes.com)

WTF, ^_^. 

但是,给了我一个念头与一个线头,从墙内到墙外的”进步/保守“演化。有些”纯理论“,还没全想好,working on it, *_*。

古纸兄新的一周开心。

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!