握手。。。哈哈。。:)。。刚才

来源: 慕容青草 2017-03-05 18:38:10 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1121 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 慕容青草 ] 在 2017-03-05 18:54:05 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

我说康德不愿给例子其实是错误的。。。他很重视例子,只不过不认为有必要给专业人士过多地讲例子而已。。下面是他的原话:

Examples and illustrations always appeared necessary to me, and hence actually appeared in their proper place in my first draft. But then I looked at the size of my task and the many objects with which I would have to do, and I became aware that this alone, treated in a dry, merely scholastic manner, would suffice to fill an extensive work; thus I found it inadvisable to swell it further with examples and illustrations, which are necessary only for a popular aim, especially since this work could never be made suitable for popular use, and real experts in this science do not have so much need for things to be made easy for them; although this would always be agreeable, here it could also have brought with it something counter-productive.

http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!