Which ranking system is more widely accepted between the above two?
In China we only looked at USNEWS rankings while applying the US undergraduate programs. May be we should have had a look at forbes as well?
I feel Forbes might be miss leading. It is so much difference here!
As far as the rankings for business programs are concerned, USNEWS or Businessweek is more valuable?
Hope people having solid knowledge in this topic could share your knowledge with us,so more Chinese students will benefit while applying for the undergraduate/postgraduate programs in US.
Thanks very much in advance!
USNEWS VS FORBES
所有跟帖:
•
中国人怎么这么蠢?别人给你个名单你就信?那都是花钱买来的。
-中国母亲-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/12/2009 postreply
07:50:27
•
回复:中国人怎么这么蠢?别人给你个名单你就信?那都是花钱买来的。
-emorysh-
♀
(227 bytes)
()
08/13/2009 postreply
20:23:35
•
they are 2 different formats
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(159 bytes)
()
08/13/2009 postreply
09:39:06
•
回复:they are 2 different formats
-emorysh-
♀
(1551 bytes)
()
08/13/2009 postreply
20:18:06
•
国内家长和学生都不重视liberal arts学院
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(312 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
07:13:51
•
今年liberal arts学院比较好申请
-emorysh-
♀
(21 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
07:51:18
•
那几个大热门colleages肯定不错。
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
08:14:04
•
回复:那几个大热门colleages肯定不错。
-emorysh-
♀
(161 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
09:10:33
•
emory你还抱怨?南方名校啊。
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
10:24:55
•
别给孩子瞎折腾了,emory是名校,声誉很好的
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
10:26:12
•
谢谢!看FORBES给排到了80多位,心里有点不平衡,呵呵。
-emorysh-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
19:51:04
•
你去看看duke排哪里去了,哈哈
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/15/2009 postreply
08:19:14
•
也未见得
-rbrb-
♀
(63 bytes)
()
08/14/2009 postreply
20:27:06
•
你是(好)异类嘛,哈哈
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/15/2009 postreply
08:19:50
•
回复:也未见得
-emorysh-
♀
(395 bytes)
()
08/16/2009 postreply
06:27:07
•
没有什么大区别。
-中国母亲-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/16/2009 postreply
09:39:20
•
本来放这的回帖却窜位了,在下只有这个笔名
-emorysh-
♀
(58 bytes)
()
08/18/2009 postreply
08:41:37
•
USNEWS # 1school: Harvard; FORBES #1 school: West Point
-greatway-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/20/2009 postreply
06:43:44