你要是一而再，再而三的玩这种把戏就没意思了

同样，下面是原文链接：

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/08/AR2011020800540.html?sid=ST2011021106912

你给的这篇摘要又是说一半话，而且，把不该加上的加上了。

1. WP的原文压根就没提San Diego警察事件，而这篇摘要第一句就加上了，给人的感觉是Toy根本就是无辜的。而事实上，我发的上一篇WSJ的文章已经说了，那是一起确定了的事件，而且是Toy设计引起。

2. WP同时说了这篇报告只分析了9辆车。

Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety, was also critical of the report from the Transportation Department.

"Their report points out that only one in 100,000 cars have had unintended acceleration, but then they tested only nine vehicles," he said. As a result, he said, the odds of the scientists finding a vehicle with the problem were very slim.

我的结论是你必须鼓吹Toy，为Toy辩护，至于是否是事实是毫不在乎的。你是卖丰田车的吗？