说明奥巴judge滥用职权

amton911 • 13 minutes ago • edited

Your headline should read "Obama judge uses judicial process to attempt to punish attorneys who questioned Biden's win, whose allegations were based on far more evidence than all the lawsuits filed against Trump"

This "judicial" decision will never stand up, and it is obviously nakedly political. Lawyers are not required to "verify" the statements in an affadavit - how could they possibly ever do so? People are well aware that they sign affadavits under penalty of perjury, and that is the mechanism by which allegations in affadavits are controlled. The notion that lawyers must go beyond that and independently verify each and every fact alleged is horrific judging, and this will obviously be overturned on appeal.

所有跟帖： 

• 看清楚，这是美国法官的判决。 -行道人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:28:57

• 奥巴任命的judge滥用职权。 -bustout- ♀ (30507 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:29:42

• 知道美国三权分立吗？美国人心目中最看重的Judicial System，Trump任命的Judge/Justice， -行道人- ♂ (142 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:35:44

• 是滴， 这个jude的决定也可以被高院判无理取闹。 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:40:52

• 当然可以也可能。但为何是“奥巴judge滥用职权"? -行道人- ♂ (38 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:46:18

• 是滴。Only if 4 SC justices agree to take the case from the Court o -akc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:48:15

• Court of Appeals. They have to appeal to the CA first. -akc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:49:58

• 滥用职权 case巡回法院也会take滴 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:50:59

• CA has to take every appeal from the district court. -akc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 18:02:48

• 如果在这个liberal地方fail， 不是还可以上诉吗 -bustout- ♀ (2553 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 18:25:13

• 可以上?到第六巡回法院- US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. -akc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 18:41:34

• 对。A good lawyer would and should know it’s a bad -akc- ♂ (264 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:42:46

• 谢谢Info！ -行道人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 18:06:35

• 可是奥巴任命的judge大多数无理取闹， 被高院推翻比比皆是 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:43:23

• 张口就来。证据呢？ -行道人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:47:41

• 太多了，感兴趣可以google -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:49:41

• 知不知道 Claimer needs to provide evidence? -行道人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2021 postreply 17:52:18