1. What is the basis of appointing a special counsel rather than

来源: SwiperTheFox 于 2020-12-20 10:29:27 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读： 0 次 (250 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ SwiperTheFox ] 在 2020-12-20 10:29:47 编辑过。如有问题，请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
回答: Special Counsels or Committee on Election Fraud 由 王利民 于 2020-12-20 10:01:20

the Justice Department?

2. If President Trump and his allies have admissible evidence, then the proper recourse would be arguing in courts, which he and his allies have done and lost almost all the cases.

 

所有跟帖： 

• you probably have learned the American justice system from "main -王利民- ♂ 给 王利民 发送悄悄话 王利民 的博客首页 (107 bytes) () 12/20/2020 postreply 10:43:56

• Please cite legal documents to answer my questions or present -SwiperTheFox- ♂ 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (101 bytes) () 12/20/2020 postreply 10:46:23

• here something. judges are influenced humans living on materials -王利民- ♂ 给 王利民 发送悄悄话 王利民 的博客首页 (334 bytes) () 12/20/2020 postreply 10:52:59

• True. That is why trump appointed 3 justices and 1 in the last -2488- ♂ 给 2488 发送悄悄话 (37 bytes) () 12/20/2020 postreply 10:59:07

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”