美国投资界真的像中国宣传的那样吗？CNBC邀请对冲击基金经理上电视访谈：为什么支持对中贸易战

 

以及不可预测性的谈判手法为何对美国有利？

Hedge fund manager Kyle Bass explains why he supports Trump's trade war with China. *****n5fkrZS4BL pic.twitter.com/3VPCSSAXqN

— CNBC (@CNBC) August 6, 2018

 

上周五在这个美国商业频道上辩论中美贸易战谁先眨眼

章家敦称2017年中国真实GDP增长率可能只有2.5%

US vs. China trade war: Who has more to lose? from CNBC.

中国的GDP增长率有多少水分？ 专家各执一词 *****0OJjdC0WKO via @RFA_Chinese

— RFA自由亚洲唐琪薇 (@viennarrrrr) November 22, 2017

 

美国商业部长最近讲，如果一定要打贸易战，当然要选在敌弱我强的时候，那现在就是正当其时。

.@SecretaryRoss on trade war with China: "[China is] feeling pain themselves. They're also finding it not so easy to substitute for all of our farm products." #specialreport pic.twitter.com/suPHd0xJyk

— Fox News (@FoxNews) July 25, 2018

.@GordonGChang on U.S.-China trade talks: "You really can't negotiate with the Chinese at this particular time, Xi Jinping's in trouble at home and this means that you just got to pile on the pressure." pic.twitter.com/iTHTqFA9ub

— FOX Business (@FoxBusiness) August 2, 2018

Trump’s #TradeWar may spark a Chinese debt crisis.
(via @bopinion)*****a4NcC7dKq9 pic.twitter.com/exMKCUl89i

— BloombergQuint (@BloombergQuint) July 18, 2018

 

仅从股市表现上比较，中美反差之大太晃眼了。

 

但从政治上看，就不那么简单了。中国报复从美国进口的农产品，让自己的国民在基本民生上受压迫，另一位嘉宾说，习主席才不关心自己国家的穷人，来自老百姓的压力在他眼里啥也不是。

中国的这种政治体制优势：无民主法治，基本人权也无保障，再加上用专制化的教育手段以及严控传媒打压真相，让民众噤言封口，无死角地对国民大规模洗脑，美国哪里会是对手？

 

所以关心贸易战的走向，确实不能不关注中国时局。

中国出生的美国著名中国问题专家裴敏欣的近作笔下

弥漫着不满的的这个中国夏天:

#China's President Xi Jinping jolted his countrymen by abolishing the presidential term limit and becoming president for life. But the real surprise was to come later. *****eoVr3kDAPo

— Asia Times (@asiatimesonline) August 4, 2018

 

福布斯专栏作者周末发表的文章：

中国将输掉与美国的贸易战，但这对中国人民有利

China Will Lose The Trade War With America, And That's Good For Its Citizens*****ij9Lj7Lkv6

— Forbes Leadership (@ForbesLeaders) August 6, 2018

 

《华尔街日报》：中国正在输掉与川普的贸易战

The Chinese know they are too vulnerable to maintain the trade war with the U.S., writes @DonLuskin *****loz9ohm0wN via @WSJOpinion

— WSJ Editorial Page (@WSJopinion) July 28, 2018

Interdependence was always exaggerated. In US certain sectors would be hurt for a while until substitutes are found. In China macro-economy will dive further. Trade War Hurts China While U.S. Economy Booms via @forbes *****blqbjis1dr

— Daniel Blumenthal (@DAlexBlumenthal) August 1, 2018

 

所有跟帖： 

• 其实说对也容易，把他经常说的加个不字即可，呵呵。 -Maax- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/07/2018 postreply 08:31:20

• 这个踢不扣志大才疏 -amigo- ♂ (244 bytes) () 08/07/2018 postreply 08:37:15

• 我对tibuko的景仰犹如滔滔江水连绵不绝又如黄河泛滥一发不可收拾.天地可证。日月可见啊！ -lost2008- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/07/2018 postreply 08:52:49

• +100, 士别三日的感觉 -农业砖家- ♂ (169 bytes) () 08/07/2018 postreply 09:00:46

• 这年月还用章家敦，也真是没人了 -听听意见- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/07/2018 postreply 09:13:53

• even a broken clock will be right twice a day. but he? -pacsqc- ♂ (83 bytes) () 08/07/2018 postreply 10:07:47