虽然不常见,但有先例

来源: 日理万机 2016-09-19 20:47:44 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (958 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 日理万机 ] 在 2016-09-19 20:48:48 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

"There is no federal law or constitutional provision requiring electors to vote for the party that nominated them, and over the years a number of electors have voted against the instructions of the voters. The most recent example of a faithless elector was probably an accident:  in 2008, a Minnesota elector nominated by the Democratic Party cast a ballot for John Edwards, the vice presidential running mate of John Kerry. It is not common for an elector to vote for the other party's candidate, however:  remember that most electors are selected by the political party for their party loyalty, and many are party leaders. The last time an elector crossed party lines was in 1972, when an elector nominated by the Republican Party cast his ballot for the Libertarian ticket."

所有跟帖: 

很少见。而且关键是 佛罗里达的小布不是选举人(elector)。 -michigan007- 给 michigan007 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/19/2016 postreply 21:04:28

Faithless electors in history - wiki -日理万机- 给 日理万机 发送悄悄话 (78953 bytes) () 09/19/2016 postreply 21:10:23

见About the Electors, 佛罗里达的小布不可能是选举人(选民elector)。 -michigan007- 给 michigan007 发送悄悄话 (454 bytes) () 09/19/2016 postreply 21:25:03

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”