To understand your statement

来源: SwiperTheFox 于 2016-08-13 09:25:28 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : 0 (514 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ SwiperTheFox ] 在 2016-08-13 09:29:14 编辑过。如有问题，请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

I think we have to assume fav%/unfav% directly translate into vote for / not vote for;   Can you do that?

To attest to accuracy--notice the wording "final"--means close to election.  I haven't checked, but I bet the "final" by most polling agency are not that far off.   CNN might quote Gallup.   Assuming Gallup is objective, CNN might say "according to Gallup" etc etc.    Where does the bias come from?

所有跟帖： 

• Where does the bias come from? 多了。 -Chris20119- ♂ 给 Chris20119 发送悄悄话 (299 bytes) () 08/13/2016 postreply 11:45:33

• Specifically to this issue -SwiperTheFox- ♂ 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (87 bytes) () 08/13/2016 postreply 12:10:28

• Gallup reports 8%, CNN reports 10%. That’s biased. -Chris20119- ♂ 给 Chris20119 发送悄悄话 (269 bytes) () 08/13/2016 postreply 12:44:13

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！