To understand your statement

来源: SwiperTheFox 2016-08-13 09:25:28 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (514 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ SwiperTheFox ] 在 2016-08-13 09:29:14 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

I think we have to assume fav%/unfav% directly translate into vote for / not vote for;   Can you do that?

To attest to accuracy--notice the wording "final"--means close to election.  I haven't checked, but I bet the "final" by most polling agency are not that far off.   CNN might quote Gallup.   Assuming Gallup is objective, CNN might say "according to Gallup" etc etc.    Where does the bias come from?

所有跟帖: 

Where does the bias come from? 多了。 -Chris20119- 给 Chris20119 发送悄悄话 (299 bytes) () 08/13/2016 postreply 11:45:33

Specifically to this issue -SwiperTheFox- 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (87 bytes) () 08/13/2016 postreply 12:10:28

Gallup reports 8%, CNN reports 10%. That’s biased. -Chris20119- 给 Chris20119 发送悄悄话 (269 bytes) () 08/13/2016 postreply 12:44:13

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”