How to 纠正? 纠正what? The guilty verdict is based on

the UNANIMOUS vote of 12 UNRELATED jurors who believed, BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT, that the officer was reckless.   They believed that the facts presented by the prosecution, not that presented by the defendent, were likely to be true.  So the jurors only determined which side's stated facts are more believable.  The jury had no role in deciding what the punishment should be.

If there are things to blame here, the first thing is probably whether the defense has done a good job to convince at least one juror into believing the defendent's story.

So, what to 纠正?  To force a juror to change his/her belief of what actually happened??

所有跟帖： 

• 当然要纠正。纠正判决结果是其次，主要是得纠正他们对亚裔（或华裔）的偏见。 -robato- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/22/2016 postreply 17:04:34

• Just to help you a bit, the whole trial is essentially about -zhuanqian- ♂ (366 bytes) () 02/22/2016 postreply 19:49:35