密执根州参议院通过法律:和任何动物(包括人)冈交判15年监,尽管联邦高法认为冈交合法(英文原文)

来源: luxh009 2016-02-08 17:32:56 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (2741 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ luxh009 ] 在 2016-02-08 17:33:48 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

Michigan Senate Passes Bill Making Anal Sex Punishable By 15 Years In Prison

The measure was snuck into a bill banning animal abuse.
 

The Michigan Senate just passed a bill that makes sodomy a felony, despite the U.S. Supreme Court declaring such a law unconstitutional.

The state’s law, which makes anal sex punishable by up to 15 years in prison, is not specifically targeted at gay people, as it’s illegal regardless of whether a couple is same-sex or different-sex.

 

Instead, the sodomy ban is directly linked to a law against bestiality, essentially saying the two are equal.

The law states that it is a felony for anyone to commit “the abominable and detestable crime against nature with mankind or with any animal.”

It’s the “with mankind” wording that creates the loophole to keep the sodomy ban intact, even though the 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas declared it unconstitutional.

Now that the bill has passed through the Senate, it is headed to the House for approval, which means there is still time to change the wording and keep “mankind” out of it entirely.

But GOP Senator Rick Jones says an attempt like that could put the entire bill, created to protect animals, in jeopardy.

“The minute I cross that line and I start talking about the other stuff, I won’t even get another hearing. It’ll be done,” said Jones. “Nobody wants to touch it. I would rather not even bring up the topic, because I know what would happen. You’d get both sides screaming and you end up with a big fight that’s not needed because it’s unconstitutional.”

Jones believes that the sodomy ban can only be repealed if a bill is created to strike all unconstitutional laws from the state’s books, but he is not willing to do it at the expense of his dog bill.

“If we could put a bill in that said anything that’s unconstitutional be removed from the legal books of Michigan, that’s probably something I could vote for,” he said. “But am I going to mess up this dog bill that everybody wants? No.”

所有跟帖: 

应该说通过"议案(Bill) -耐心的钓鱼人- 给 耐心的钓鱼人 发送悄悄话 耐心的钓鱼人 的博客首页 (44 bytes) () 02/09/2016 postreply 03:30:22

In the law of the United States, federal preemption is the inval -闻达- 给 闻达 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/09/2016 postreply 10:46:40

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”