解释:

来源: Francine 2016-12-01 09:26:45 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (756 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ Francine ] 在 2016-12-01 09:30:06 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

There are two types of recount petitions pending in PA.  One is voter initiated; the other candidate initiated.  The decision reported in the news relates to the first type.  The petition filed in a state court in Harriburg is the second type.  In theory, the decision in one does not affect the disposition in the other.  However, because the petitions and the governing laws are nearly identical substantively, one can think of a decision in one being a bellwether case of the other.  Because the attorneys, substance of arguments, personal politics of the presiding judges do not all match from one venue to the other,  in theory the outcomes of the two cases may differ.

 

所有跟帖: 

还是没有彻底回答问题。以上回答适用于同一种petition在不同county的案子。 -Francine- 给 Francine 发送悄悄话 Francine 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2016 postreply 09:32:35

唉,太复杂了 -落花起作回风舞- 给 落花起作回风舞 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2016 postreply 09:34:24

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”