当然真理也许掌握在少数人手里,但是你不能把绝对多数说成七三开。
参见:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming
• Where is the 95% number from? Please don't count me in. -moreco2pls- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 06:04:49
• 恭喜您,您肯定在5%之内,如果您认为坚持错误时间光荣的事儿,您就“光荣了” -Chiyankun- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 06:45:30
• Blow up the chart on top right, addup the numbers; 95% is an un -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 07:04:45
• Where is the 95% number from? Please don't count me in. -燕京十景- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 06:46:42
• Have to pat on my back on my ability of eyeballing -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (366 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 07:09:29
• You do realize that many key climate studies have been shown to -燕京十景- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 07:13:10
• Depending on what you think is key. I would accept -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (267 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 07:17:37
• Global warming and GMO are no longer a scientific question, but -燕京十景- ♀ (627 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 07:41:10
• Sorry Telegraph is a news agency -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (292 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 07:49:53
• Telegraph cites peer-reviewed papers, if you care to dig into it -燕京十景- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 08:19:08
• On a separate point, people should think about what risks they s -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (454 bytes) () 11/21/2014 postreply 07:22:01