By stability, they mean different things

Under the condition of Tibet being permenent part of China, I believe, so do the rest of the world, that Da Lai can deliver stability to China.

Obviously, it might not be enough for China. The problem is that China wants more tham stability AND they did not reveal what more they want.

As communists, they use the word "stability" to mean different thing: control. Control over people; control over governance; control over resources; control over life style; control over culture; control over religion and etc. It is not the kind of stability we as average people think of. CCP want similar type of stability as we see in jail. A "Everything is under control" type of stability. That is parting point in this communication.

So I believe that that the true contention between Da Lai and CCP is who/how to govern Tibet as part of China, not whether or not Tibet is part of China, which has already been settled.

所有跟帖： 

• Have you ever been live in Mainland China? -SAR- ♀ (35 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 10:24:03

• 30 years in Beijing, through Cultural revolution up until 6.4 -baiwen- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 10:36:29

• You should give some encouragement -sniper007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 11:22:13

• to whom to do what? -baiwen- ♂ (272 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 11:41:35

• 那你跟我们已经有代沟了。。。 -天天向上2000- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/25/2008 postreply 20:18:29