You forgot to validate your result.

来源: QualityWithoutName 2008-07-21 20:43:16 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (374 bytes)
Your analysis is pretty impressive, but you forget to compair the end results: like Works of

Shakespeare vs ???, David hume vs ??? Adam Smith vs ???
Isaac Newton vs ???

My impression, our chinese language tends to be ambiguous just because the features you mentioned. It is good for poetry, but not good for communications where accuracy is important.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”