回复:仍然需要请教一个问题

来源: akc 2006-09-09 13:01:07 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (1106 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ akc ] 在 2006-10-12 18:35:03 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
I generally agree with your observations,particularly with regard to patient privacy. I am not sure what state you're from. New York has recently strengthened its patient privacy law. The patient information, even a procedural matter, cannot be released to ANYONE except to the patient himself/herself without a written authorization.
On the other hand, Mao was a public figure and his privacy rights was somewhat restricted compared to a normal person. Dr. Li at least violated the generally accepted medical ethics. For example we know JFK was not very "active" among women, we have not seen any writings from his private dictor regarding his sexual habit, his virility, and sex adventures.
With regard to the close relationship between Wang Tung-shing and Dr. Li,assuming it was true, Wang violated the strict communist party organization discipline of secrecy by disclosing such a sensitive and life and death matter to a unrelated person simply because he was your close "political ally". Even Li Chien-nien was not notified of the events leading to the arrest of the Gang of Four.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”