回复:请问各位大侠, 律师的解释对吗? 谢谢!

来源: akc 2006-12-16 07:36:46 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (432 bytes)
Your attorney created the confusion by unnecessarily and unwisely inserting the alternative requirement of B + 3.
The minimum requirement for the position is B + 3 (EB-3).
You may qualify for EB-2 if the CIS overlooks the alternative education requirement or it takes a lot of good lawyering skill to argue for EB-2.
The CIS not the DOL is the final arbiter of interpreting a LC when adjudicating the I-140 petition.

所有跟帖: 

Thanks, ack! Two more questions. -John_Owen- 给 John_Owen 发送悄悄话 (551 bytes) () 12/16/2006 postreply 11:58:08

回复:Thanks, ack! Two more questions. -akc- 给 akc 发送悄悄话 (683 bytes) () 12/17/2006 postreply 08:39:48

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”