我请ChatGPT比较OpenAI,DeepSeek,以及豆包。这是ChatGPT的回答:

Comparison of OpenAI (GPT-4/5) vs. DeepSeek vs. Doubao Across Use Cases

 

General Chatbot

        OpenAI (GPT-4/5): Best at complex reasoning, broad knowledge.

        DeepSeek: Strong in Chinese, improving in logic.

        Doubao: Good for Chinese users, integrates with Baidu services.

 

Coding

        OpenAI (GPT-4/5): Advanced (Python, JS, C++, etc.), strong debugging.

        DeepSeek: Strong in Python, improving in other languages.

        Doubao: Weaker in coding tasks.

 

Enterprise AI

        OpenAI (GPT-4/5): Microsoft-backed, integrates with Office & Azure.

        DeepSeek: Potential for business AI, but not fully realized yet.

        Doubao: Baidu Cloud integration, good for China-based businesses.

 

Multilingual Support

        OpenAI (GPT-4/5): Excellent (English, Spanish, French, etc.).

        DeepSeek: Strong in Chinese, decent in English.

        Doubao: Mainly optimized for Chinese.

 

Creativity (Writing, Art, etc.)

        OpenAI (GPT-4/5): Strong for storytelling, poetry, and brainstorming.

        DeepSeek: Decent for creative tasks, more structured responses.

        Doubao: Weaker in creative writing.

 

Search & Integration

        OpenAI (GPT-4/5): Bing-powered, real-time web search (when enabled).

        DeepSeek: Lacks web search capabilities.

        Doubao: Deeply integrated with Baidu’s search.

 

Key Takeaways:

        Best overall chatbot experience: OpenAI (GPT-4/5).

        Best for coding & logic-heavy tasks: OpenAI & DeepSeek (OpenAI leads).

        Best for Chinese business & Baidu services: Doubao.

        Best for global business & enterprise AI: OpenAI, thanks to Microsoft backing.

        Best for multilingual support: OpenAI, with DeepSeek improving and Doubao lagging.

 

 

 

所有跟帖: 

豆包: -天青云淡- 给 天青云淡 发送悄悄话 (255 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:09:48

哈哈哈哈! -大观园的贾探春- 给 大观园的贾探春 发送悄悄话 大观园的贾探春 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:12:02

你这个估计是编的吧?里面这个隔壁搬来的deepseek的可能是真的 -Feinbery- 给 Feinbery 发送悄悄话 (81 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:15:24

谁用AI关心和问这种政治话题,吃饱了撑的! -lionhill- 给 lionhill 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:16:09

哈哈,非常有中国特色,顶一个.媲美Google上次的那个AI...绝了.都是垃圾进,垃圾出. -Pilsung- 给 Pilsung 发送悄悄话 (209 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:22:10

一个问题。ChatGPT 是如何知道刚发布的DeepSeek R1的能力的? -yddad- 给 yddad 发送悄悄话 yddad 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:12:34

劝你去看看CNBC访谈别天天发垃圾,有本事自己做点研究!你发的没人看也没人感兴趣,自己识点相! -lionhill- 给 lionhill 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:19:06

反了你了!“长公主”的护法何在? -我是谁的谁- 给 我是谁的谁 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:27:58

两位兄台,对美女还是手下留情吧. -Pilsung- 给 Pilsung 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:32:58

据一个台湾女同胞,和大陆众多同胞揭发,探春不是台湾来的,绝大可能是大陆来的,甚至是男的。 -Feinbery- 给 Feinbery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:42:52

你总算回味过来了?被骗的感觉如何?你觉得几个台湾淑女知道郭沫若裤裆里的事、对文革的细节了解那么深? -我是谁的谁- 给 我是谁的谁 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:46:04

你真看不出我是讽刺你们这些怀疑一切,只会扣帽子的人?嘿嘿 -Feinbery- 给 Feinbery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:47:30

还以为你变聪明了呢 -我是谁的谁- 给 我是谁的谁 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:48:02

探春对军事上每种武器的细节也了如指掌啊,比我们懂王三军总司令川总懂得多多了。无她 -Feinbery- 给 Feinbery 发送悄悄话 (48 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:53:42

我比较相信双琴的分析,他如果鉴定为台湾女人,应该相信他一把。 -Pilsung- 给 Pilsung 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:49:40

探春当然是台湾来的爱祖国的小留。不爱祖国的台湾人民根本不会来这儿,躲大陆人民都躲不及。 -Feinbery- 给 Feinbery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2025 postreply 07:50:58

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!