美国国会和奥8马给爱（中）国海外学子的一记响亮耳光

摘要：

7870亿美元的经济振兴计划里规定的条款，将允许加拿大、日本、西欧等国家参与，而禁止中国、印度等国家参与项目或者购买那些国家产品。


China criticizes 'Buy American' provision in U.S. stimulus bill

BEIJING: China's official news agency, Xinhua, slammed the "Buy American" requirement of the U.S. economic stimulus package, saying in a commentary that trade protectionism is a "poison" that will harm poor countries.

The remarks on Saturday are the first indication of the reaction in Beijing to the U.S. measure, which has been criticized by U.S. business groups that fear it could invite other countries to keep American goods out of their own stimulus programs.

"History and economic theory show that in facing a financial crisis, trade protectionism is not a way out, but rather could become just the poison that worsens global economic hardships," Xinhua said in the overnight commentary, issued in response to the passing of the U.S. plan.

The U.S. Congress approved the $787 billion plan to jump start the world's biggest economy on Friday, stipulating that public works and building projects funded by the stimulus use only U.S.-made goods, including iron and steel.

The plan does require that procurement be carried out in a manner consistent with U.S. obligations under multilateral and bilateral trade pacts, potentially giving Canada, the European Union, Japan and some other countries the chance to benefit from the additional spending.

But countries like China, India, Brazil and Russia, which are not members of an international government procurement agreement, would be shut out.

Xinhua cited the example of the Great Depression of the 1930s as showing that moves to protect domestic markets, and ensuing trade wars, could have only negative effects on the global economy.

"Trade protectionism will also cause catastrophic effects to some poor countries, making the current financial crisis one of a humanitarian crisis as well," it said.

所有跟帖： 

• 说明：没有任何美国法律规定必须这么做，国会协调时硬加了此条款 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 14:07:13

• 我要是这样成立一美国钢铁公司,你看可不可行... -aa123- ♂ (92 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 15:00:14

• 你操作起来很难吧，进口钢，再回炉，成本太高点 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 15:45:02

• 比把矿石炼成钢便宜吧? -aa123- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 16:20:34

• 未必。你假设中国钢材质量相同，价格很低。 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (62 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 16:33:49

• 完全没看明白你的标题 -小马识图- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 14:19:05

• 回复：完全没看明白你的标题 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (18 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 14:24:17

• 其实贸易保护是很正常的，中国政府在此之前已经有所行动了 -z.a- ♂ (276 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 15:22:57

• 就是啊。哪个国家不是以本国的贸易利益至上的 -山水安妮- ♀ (84 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:08:02

• 谈不上耳光。老奥反华的嘴脸在竞选中早已展示无疑。 -doitright- ♀ (127 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 15:36:42

• 他能力不行 -吾- ♂ (34 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 15:38:42

• he also said "I would stop the import of all toys from China -535897932384626- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 15:44:30

• 这和反不反华好像没有什么关系吧。胳膊肘向外拐的毕竟还是少数 -woth- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:08:28

• 基本属实，用词可商榷。:D -doitright- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 16:43:37

• 同意 -吾- ♂ (59 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 16:57:21

• So it is OK to borrow money 来维持 ? -VaeVictis- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:19:39

• 打着老忽没？ -noso- ♂ (44 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 16:46:52

• 那个自称老忽的还没有断奶呢 -CarCrazier- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:22:40

• 我觉得没什么啊。说实话，我是支持本地产品的。一些东西 -woth- ♀ (256 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 17:53:35

• 富人啊。看着价格底就难受 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 17:58:29

• 不是富人。我只是觉得中国的产品以这么低的价格出售， -woth- ♀ (178 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:02:22

• 你这是啥逻辑？价格低，你就抵制。那国内厂产品滞销，你才高兴？ -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:07:23

• 你以为国内希望卖这么低的产品么，很多情况这么卖，都 -woth- ♀ (319 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:15:51

• let's put in this way -用户名被占用了- ♂ (337 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:23:34

• 呵呵。如果有人以更高的价格进货，厂家还会愿意把货卖 -woth- ♀ (538 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:38:36

• 嘿嘿，你把市场的驱动力量本末倒置了:-)) -Z.A- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:01:04

• 这不是the only way. 中国人不是命中注定只能做廉价品的 -山水安妮- ♀ (395 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:02:00

• 但这个过程是不可能避免的，和日本南韩一样，而且会更长一些， -Z.A- ♂ (417 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:18:23

• 是这么一说， 可是我们光指着外国人买我们的东西不行哦 -山水安妮- ♀ (115 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:23:07

• 中国的生产能力和劳力资源目前大大超过内需所能提供的市场 -Z.A- ♂ (374 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:30:53

• 中国的农业现在已经是个很大的问题了，农村劳动力不是 -woth- ♀ (16 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:34:40

• 因为目前农村的土地分块过小，农业机械缺少用武之地，仍然需要 -Z.A- ♂ (56 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:45:28

• 情况和你想象的不一样，如果出口不赚钱，长三角和珠三角就不会有 -z.a- ♂ (275 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:28:30

• 中国是通过压榨劳动力，破坏环境获得这样的竞争的 -woth- ♀ (76 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:42:12

• 压榨的概念是相对的。你认为这些农民工在家乡的生活状态比打工的 -Z.A- ♂ (507 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:53:46

• 嗯，是这个理儿。。。真不明白这的中国人 -doitright- ♀ (26 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:06:45

• 呵呵，抵制沃尔马，主要是抵制它的垄断。中国产品如果有 -woth- ♀ (22 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:44:53

• 沃尔马没有垄断的问题和可能性。有些美国人反对它是因为它的现代经营 -Z.A- ♂ (72 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:49:38

• 我老家就是农村的。那里的变化，看了只让我痛心。我爷爷奶奶 -woth- ♀ (1398 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:26:36

• 中国的可耕地和农村人口，比例严重失调。即使在城镇打工 -doitright- ♀ (196 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:35:39

• 并不比种地的强。种地的至少生活还有保障，现在农业税 -woth- ♀ (414 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:43:13

• 你实际上把好几个方面的问题混在一起了：-)) -Z.A- ♂ (645 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 19:43:15

• 另外。我觉得看东西不能只看一个方面。就拿美国大学的 -woth- ♀ (215 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:06:01

• not true at all -用户名被占用了- ♂ (246 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:13:25

• true -吾- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:16:01

• 呵呵，有多少美国人去中国留学，又有多少中国人在美国 -woth- ♀ (140 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:20:09

• you don't need special form. Just write in tax article 20(c) in -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:25:13

• 太不厚道了吧，我们得一记耳光你这么幸灾乐祸的～　唉， -春眠- ♀ (12 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 17:55:13

• 中国货价低，大部分利润被美国拿去了。 -grandland- ♀ (102 bytes) () 02/15/2009 postreply 18:34:11