陇山陇西郡

宁静纯我心 感得事物人 写朴实清新. 闲书闲话养闲心,闲笔闲写记闲人;人生无虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
个人资料
  • 博客访问:
文章分类
归档
正文

自古貨比貨道理: 競爭對手較勁爭更好?

(2016-09-27 11:13:03) 下一个

自古貨比貨道理: 競爭對手較勁爭更好? Election is shopping around, but not if you dig deep:

Admitted: "而希拉裏還在粉飾太平,她的辯論技巧要高於川普,但是美國現在需要實際改變的領導者" Clinton's boring, not inspiring; however, Trump disappointed some as he didn't prepare with specifics showing how he can fix it as he claimned "America's terrible, terrible, I alone can fix it. "

Show me how! No. That's secret -! "可不是一句口號和決心就夠了。選民曆年來都聽和很多口號,人們要實際的細節。"

- Tax law is basic. Given this, can you expect Trump to "law and order?" You don't/shouldn't take advantages of other's miserables - Trump ran over those little-business contractors. God forbidden "

build on respect(建立在尊重之上)”

李嘉诚不希望别人称呼他为老板,他更愿意以“领袖”要求自己。“一般而言,做老板简单得多,你的权力主要来自你的地位,这可能是上天的缘分或凭着你的努力和专业的知识。做领袖就比较复杂,你的力量源自人性的魅力和号召力。”在一次接受访问时,李曾这样自我解答:“做一个成功的管理者,态度与能力一样重要。领袖领导众人,促动别人自觉甘心卖力;老板只懂支配众人,让别人感到渺小。

"The number of interruptions could be up for debate. Vox reports Trump interrupted Clinton 25 times in the first 26 minutes. "

CNN total candidate speaking times , Clinton: 41:12 Trump: 46:12 - 立場 - ♂     (http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/currentevent/871190.html)      Being a woman, you lose the groupd here: Trump 5 min more than Clinton -  Tell me who ruled - overran the other here? - In the eyes of the public, he didn't give a damn about the rule of governing the Presidential debate - how could you expect him to restore "law and order?"

""If he wants to do better next time, Trump needs to drop the habit of narrating his own performance. "I think my strongest asset, maybe by far, is my temperament," he told us Monday. "I have a winning temperament." Regardless of whether we agree with the content of the statement, simply reiterating it won't convince anyone.

There's an adage in storytelling, known to every college creative writing class, and yet invariably forgotten by politicians. Show, don't tell. If you want your character to look heroic, show him rescuing a child from a blaze or saving civilians under fire -- but whatever you do, do not let him announce to an audience: "I am a heroic character." If you are a politician, and you want to portray judgment and temperance, behave with dignity in debate -- and don't bother to tell us."""

(by Theater critic Kate Maltby: Trump tried to narrate his own debate, write his own review")

 

 

Just a rich big boy, doesn't care about what the heck of ordinary Americans' life - he's ego maniac - aldrenaline thrust-driven - I say whatever I want - you can't do anything about it. He got everything as he claimed, like Romney, but only needs this title for his resume - that's his ego maniac. Doesn't give a damn about the public - folks - how can you expect him to? As he's hardly seen a real one? That's why he didn't come up with any specifics how to serve the ordinary folks. No clues.

 

In the end of the day, only God can decide who got that Presidential Look, not even voters. - thus, save your energy for yourselves jumping feet here shouting dirty cursing words-bouncing back to you if you'll. Let the show go on !

Not yet know God? Pull down the green bills - find that "In God We Trust" in American dollar bills.

"In God We Trust" - May God bless America!

~~

Not just presidential debate, but also voters' comment, fascinating! Some notetaking here:

C_talent 發表評論於

川普到了這個時候,還沒有進入細節。例如,如何改善美國這個國家非裔墨黑的境況,如何具體來創造就業機會,如何戰IS,如何把持美國的邊境,除了那個修大牆牆的方法,他還有什麽呢? 這些,可不是一句口號和決心就夠了。選民曆年來都聽和很多口號,人們要實際的細節。
C_talent 發表評論於
pcboy888 發表評論於 2016-09-27 05:46:56
川普說全世界都占美國的便宜,思路有點像中國的憤憤,什麽事情中國都成最大輸家。(聲明:我發帖一般都是批評,本帖沒批評希拉裏是因為她說了什麽我都記不住,無法彈也無法讚)
=======================
你就看吧,本城支持川普的,一定是身在美國(或者假裝身在美國),而滿腦子還是中國過去那種思維方式的。順我者昌的樣子。而本城反對川普的,一般還能夠中肯的說說希拉裏的對與錯。本城反對川普的,大概也有其實在美國而不一定是選民的老中,或者不在的,身在美國而研究美國的老中,但是至少這些人,是比較有頭腦的。而川粉則張口就汙蔑對方為:地下室吃盒飯的。多麽無聊和無知啊。

C_talent 發表評論於

公民都關心的一個主要問題之一,擾亂美國社會治安的到底是什麽? 川普他是不是說:隻有非裔墨黑和非法移民的擁槍,要取締? 而白人(橫是也有中國人?)的擁槍,是可以保留下?這就是他實現他的law n order的方法? 還是保護非裔的責任是增加警力,而他意思是說殺非裔的,正是這些警察? 他到底啥意思,他到底說了什麽方法。俺不懂。而接下來,希拉裏一方言辭,她倒是對上述川普所說不清楚的問題,說了一些適當的方式,至少,她的那些方式聽起來還比較合理,合乎美國的實情。

北美神鷹 發表評論於

川普說希拉裏沒有足夠精力勝任總統,其實意思是說她現在生病之後不可能勝任八年總統任期,如果倒退回8年前,希拉裏絕對可以勝任總統。從整體辯論會看,川普象是一個實實在在的人,坦誠講了美國現在麵臨的各種問題,而希拉裏還在粉飾太平,她的辯論技巧要高於川普,但是美國現在需要實際改變的領導者,她那點忽悠估計越來越不起作用了。

ft 發表評論於

搜了網上辯論後的投票結果,川普大幅領先。隻有CNN除外。CNN說希拉裏大幅領先,但我沒有找到即時投票的網頁沒找到根據,不知這個大幅領先的根據怎麽來的。
川普總體上表現得不錯,誠實,不講空話,給足了希拉裏尊嚴,沒有用任何harsh的言辭。反觀希拉裏,多次掏川普的往事,把主流媒體報道川普的話原樣搬出來。回答問題空洞,個人的精神狀況也很疲勞。08年她和o8辯論時是她的頂峰,即使那時,和O8的敏捷機智相比也十分遜色。老太太事業生涯已經在走下坡路了。
問題哥 發表評論於
我是認認真真去聽辯論的,無預設立場。
我感覺從準備和發揮來講,老太婆表現比較好,有職業政客的老道。老川有些急於攻擊,思路和係統性不夠好,但也過得去。。。然而,老太婆的施政思路和發揮也就是如此了,上升空間不大;而老川還有多處可以在後麵兩次辯論中表現出新意,比如 law and order,你的舉措是什麽?讓工作回到美國,作為商人你應該有讓人耳目一新的係統的辦法;移民問題,不能停留在讓墨西哥掏錢修牆的高度。。。左派和老太婆的問題大家都知道,在總統辯論中用力過猛會得不償失,老川需要用好自己的時間、發揮自己的特長,這才是王道。
僅說個人看法,不參與辯論。
 
AliciaHu 發表評論於 ”。(Trumped-up, trickle-down economy)
 
作者的水平真是糟糕。 trickle-down economy的意思不是“經濟倒“。而是指減稅讓最富人更富,帶動窮人也富起來的經濟理論。希拉裏認為這是行不通的理論。應該扶持廣大的中產階級富起來,才能真正帶動宏觀經濟。
路上的光 發表評論於
文學城裏有這麽多睜著眼說瞎話的人,明明trump那麽猥瑣,不停地打斷別人的發言,一個勁地說錯錯錯,實在讓人覺得他像個小醜

 

 


更多我的博客文章>>>

 

 

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (1)
评论
TJKCB 回复 悄悄话
您的位置: 文學城 ? 論壇 ? 時事述評 ? 自古貨比貨道理: 競爭對手較勁爭更好?

全部論壇列表




[請進來投票]2016總統大選 文學城線上民調


自古貨比貨道理: 競爭對手較勁爭更好?

 



來源: TJKCB 於 2016-09-27 09:42:19 [檔案] [博客] [轉至博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀:299 次 (11316 bytes)
登录后才可评论.