回复:强迫症 shoplift 求助

来源: apt 2006-02-03 15:26:34 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (880 bytes)
Frankly, your friend will be convicted of larceny. There are only more tests courts in the US use for insanity defense. (1) M'Naghten rule. (2) Durham rule. (3) Irresistable impulse rule. (4) MPC substantial capability rule. Majority is using M'Naghten rule which requires a disease in mind and the defendant does not know from right wrong. You said, she knew she should not buy. Sounds like she knew what's right and what's wrong. No court is using Durham rule. Irresistable impluse means on top of M'Naghten, the defendant could not control her conduct. It is not likely to work. Your only chance is that your jurisdiction uses MPC rule that the defendant lacks substantial capability to understand the criminality of her conduct or conform her conduct to the law. You need a really good lawyer and a strong testimony from a psychiartrist to convince the jury.

所有跟帖: 

多谢回复 -wxc1894- 给 wxc1894 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/03/2006 postreply 16:52:03

回复:回复:强迫症 shoplift 求助 -wxc1894- 给 wxc1894 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/03/2006 postreply 17:23:59

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”