回复:thank you for your reply!

来源: apt 2006-02-02 20:07:15 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (560 bytes)
回答: My 2 centsapt2006-02-02 15:19:51
You are absolutely right on that reasonable is very subjective. But, the subjectiveness is not on the police officer. He will be judged by a third person, either a jury or a judge (in a bench trial). In that sense reasonable is based entirely on objective standard, not the police officer, but a prudent third person. This is true for all the substantive laws. A good lawyer might argue that a police officer searching a backseat with a gun on it is reasonable, but his searching of something inside the glove box is totally unreasonable, in this context.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”