回复：res ipsa loquitur

来源: 66196 于 2005-12-07 07:53:43 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读： 次 (452 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 66196 ] 在 2006-01-03 08:15:59 编辑过。如有问题，请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
回答: 回复：我儿子也在BABY　GAP摔倒 由 68156 于 2005-12-06 22:08:05
You are right. RIL is a substitute to circumstantial evidence that will allow the jury to infer Gap's negligence. The jury can choose to infer or not infer. If they infer, they must bring a plaintiff verdict. The exclusive control, however, is refered to the injurious instrument, not the victim. In this case, it would be the floor. What it means is, Gap does the floor mopping/cleaning itself and no other person can alter the floor condition.

所有跟帖： 

• about control -68106- ♀ 给 68106 发送悄悄话 (331 bytes) () 12/07/2005 postreply 16:36:42

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”