Police's involvement is NOT...

来源: Bodd 2003-09-11 13:04:00 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (988 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ Bodd ] 在 2004-02-03 07:43:16 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
Police's involvement is NOT NECESSARY.

Ev~~~ery insu~~~rance comp~~~any h~~~as i~~~ts o~~~wn inves~~~tigator.
Pol~~~ice's invol~~~vement w~~~ill us~~~ually simpl~~~ify the ca~~~se,
tho~~~ugh so~~~metimes not, wit~~~hout pol~~~ice's wr~~~itten
ac~~~cident rep~~~ort, insur~~~ance com~~~pany wi~~~ll inves~~~tigate
the acc~~~ident its~~~elf and ma~~~ke its dec~~~ission al~~~l b~~~y
its~~~elf.

Having experienced a car accident will definitely
improve your knowledge of insurance claim, but you may
still have some incorrect concept. Do you admit that?

PS. I tried to post this article several times, but
failed. I don't know why? So I post it as a new one.


我看你不是无知,就是愚蠢
文章来源: newman# 于 2003-9-10 16:15:00
到底谁在不懂装懂,害人害己?我看你不是无知,就是愚蠢。还诚心误导他人。
我就在美国出过车祸。我没有让道,把对方的车撞了一个巴掌大的坑。 双方把警察叫来。警察一来就拿出一张表,填好事故发生的时间,地点,损害的程度,双方的驾照号码。警察问双方对谁付责任有无分歧。一个星期了,我到警察局取出一份事故报告。 我把这份报告寄给我的保险公司。 我的保险公司赔给
对方900多美元。如果警察不到场,保险公司应该相信甲方,还是乙方?




所有跟帖: 

Finally... And I am sorry. -Bodd- 给 Bodd 发送悄悄话 (242 bytes) () 09/11/2003 postreply 13:08:00

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”