回复:请教懂法律的朋友,老猫等朋友

来源: siuc 2005-07-31 20:30:12 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (479 bytes)
Based on the fact you stated in above, all of the sons of the parents are entitled to the 300,000 dollars.

First of all, he gave his parents the money as a gift. After the transaction, the money belongs to the parents. Then, the parents asked him as an agent to buy a house for them, so the money is not a gift to him.

But because there is no written agreement, he might be able to argue that the $200,000 is a gift from his parents, even though it is not the fact.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”