Comparative Negligence

他自己遛狗不牵绳，和你意外把狗绳落掉，同样是疏忽。但是由于是你的狗去咬人家的狗，你的疏忽更多一些。那么在德州的民事伤害法里面，去找contributory  negligence 的逻辑吧。

https://crosleylaw.com/blog/how-does-texas-deal-with-contributory-negligence/

Texas Negligence Laws Set a 51% Bar For Comparative Negligence

While Texas is a comparative fault state, our laws add another level of complexity to the rule. We use a modified comparative fault rule that limits an at-fault driver’s ability to recover damages. Called the 51% bar, this rule says you cannot receive compensation if you were 51% or more to blame for the crash. In other words, if you are more than 50% at fault, you lose and would get nothing.

所有跟帖： 

• 我没有把狗绳落掉，是在拉狗过程中不知道为啥栓狗的clip开了 -肥狗狗- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/07/2023 postreply 19:13:47

• 反正第一个错是你的。小争端，不要寸土必争， -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (132 bytes) () 06/07/2023 postreply 19:23:27