回應

法官可以在庭上講任何話,但是最終的判決需要看判決書中的主文.

針對您的問題,老貓的耐性已經將近用完,這事,老貓就不再多管了...

(老貓的專葉是拿耗子,管閒是的就交給狗族的朋友了 ... :-)

所有跟帖： 

• 判决书就写了：Case Dismissed Lack of Proof as to Plaintiff. 可是他嘴上说让我付钱修 -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:04:11

• 判决书上到底写了什么，是dismiss with prejudice 还是 without prejudice? -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:23:44

• JUDGE 手写：Case Dismissed Lack of Proof As to Plaintiff. -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:27:46

• 没有任何“prejudice"出现 -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:31:34

• It is dismissal with prejudice -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (122 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:35:51

• 这个字好专业，有点晕，请赐教。 -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:42:17

• 你好像很专业，请你告诉我真的是我乱埋怨JUDGE欺负我，还是他判的真的不公平？ -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 12:03:00