回复:回复:回复:2056 and 2102

来源: lexm5 2014-03-26 09:41:09 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1318 bytes)
回答: 回复:回复:2056 and 2102apt2014-03-26 08:51:01
My point is, One can leave assets worth up to the exempt amount (again, $5.25 million for deaths in 2013 and $5.34 million in 2014) to anyone, including one's noncitizen spouse, without owing any federal estate tax.

26 USC 2056 only says the "taxable estate" = "gross estate" - "marital deduction", and 2056(d)(1) provides that martial deduction does not apply to non-citizen spouse. Therefore under 2056, when a US citizen married to non-citizen spouse dies, the US citizen's "taxable estate = gross estate". But his taxable estate is not subject to estate tax if the total amount is < $ 5.34 mil in 2014, no matter who is in line for inheritance.

Your justification of providing less tax break for non-citizen spouse is valid. The law provides other limitations to non-citizen spouse, e.g. non-citizen cannot inherit unused estate exemption from the dead spouse; any jointly owned property are treated as wholly owned by the dead citizen spouse and added to his gross estate (instead of 1/2 for couple of both US citizens).

Again, I am not an expert like you, and I am entirely aware that I could be wrong. But I think the statement in my first paragraph is correct, and most middle-class couple with one non-citizen spouse do not need to worry about paying a huge estate tax on a small estate.

所有跟帖: 

Seems you are right... -N.- 给 N. 发送悄悄话 N. 的博客首页 (417 bytes) () 03/26/2014 postreply 10:54:17

回复:回复:回复:回复:2056 and 2102 -apt- 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (987 bytes) () 03/26/2014 postreply 13:26:41

回复:回复:回复:回复:回复:2056 and 2102 -lexm5- 给 lexm5 发送悄悄话 (2166 bytes) () 03/26/2014 postreply 13:57:32

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”