回复:回复:回复:我有麻烦了,向老猫求救!

来源: apt 2012-03-16 10:55:48 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1313 bytes)

As far as I know, fair housing act does not prevent HOA to implement a rule like this. Fair housing act only prohibits a landlord discriminating against a tenant based on familial status. In the old days, again I do not have to research this, any law to prohibit the same family to live together is unconstitutional. Later, the Court changed its course such that as long as such law is reasonable, it would be upheld. As a result, many cities enacted laws to regulate the number of people residing in the same property. In your case those tenants are unrelated to each other such that the CCR is not in violation of pertaining laws. There are many unanswered questions, though. For example, is your property a condo, PUD, or SFH? How is the bylaw written regarding CCR amendment? How is a majority is determined? How is a quorum determined? When you bought the house, were you promised that you could rent to individual others? Are there other properties renting to multiple individuals? How do you know the CCR modification was just targeting you? If so it may not be reasonable. That is why I said you need to consult an attorney whether you have a case against the HOA.

Email communication is not per se invalid. If agreed upon beforehand by the homeowners this is a valid form of communication.

所有跟帖: 

回复:回复:回复:回复:我有麻烦了,向老猫求救! -无边秋色- 给 无边秋色 发送悄悄话 (1684 bytes) () 03/16/2012 postreply 15:58:57

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”