不会的,你只要多想想29年之前,股市涨了三倍就明白了。“借的越多亏的越多 ”的说法不够全面。

来源: 股市小书生 2017-11-22 05:11:24 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (701 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 股市小书生 ] 在 2017-11-22 05:17:24 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
该不该借是战略问题,借多少,怎么借是战术问题。

ZT:

Anyway, if you look at the 1929 bubble, the market went far above it's previous peak. Just eye-balling, the market sort of peaked out at around 10 in 1910 or so, and then rallied to 31 in 1929. That's more than a triple of the old high. Before black monday the S&P 500 rallied to 330 before crashing, and the old high was around 100, so again, the market more than tripled before tanking. During the 1999/2000 bubble, the market went to 1500. If you use the old high of 330, the market rose by 4.5 times. if you use the 1993/1994 area high of 500, the market basically tripled that.

所有跟帖: 

长线是对的 但是具体到三五年之内 时间越短越越容易出问题 -cat18- 给 cat18 发送悄悄话 cat18 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/22/2017 postreply 05:17:39

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”