回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题

来源: ㊣wal-mart㊣ 2003-11-17 17:21:00 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (737 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ ㊣wal-mart㊣ ] 在 2004-02-03 07:43:26 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

It is advisable to check with a local attorney because the family law varies from state to state. In general the parties to a marriage have equal custodial right. There is no preference for mother at law. Of course, the child's attachment to mother will be considered while the court determines the custody issue, but it is not the only or critical facor. In the same way, the child's decision won't be determinative either, but merely a factor the court will take into consideration. The standard for awarding custody is "in the child's best interest". What your friend need to do is convince the court that granting him the custody is in the child's best interest, financially and emotionally, in the short run and in the long run.



所有跟帖: 

回复:回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题 -litchii- 给 litchii 发送悄悄话 (123 bytes) () 11/17/2003 postreply 22:52:00

回复:回复:回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题 -wal-mart- 给 wal-mart 发送悄悄话 (24 bytes) () 11/18/2003 postreply 15:41:00

回复:回复:回复:回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题 -litchii- 给 litchii 发送悄悄话 (155 bytes) () 11/18/2003 postreply 21:27:00

不过老兄,你见过多少案例孩子是判给父亲的?就算你有钱,那就多 -付赡养费好了。- 给 付赡养费好了。 发送悄悄话 (14 bytes) () 11/18/2003 postreply 23:47:00

your presumption is not right -wal-mart- 给 wal-mart 发送悄悄话 (253 bytes) () 11/19/2003 postreply 08:26:00

回复:your presumption is not right -litchii- 给 litchii 发送悄悄话 (149 bytes) () 11/19/2003 postreply 15:12:00

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”