It is advisable to check with a local attorney because the family law varies from state to state. In general the parties to a marriage have equal custodial right. There is no preference for mother at law. Of course, the child's attachment to mother will be considered while the court determines the custody issue, but it is not the only or critical facor. In the same way, the child's decision won't be determinative either, but merely a factor the court will take into consideration. The standard for awarding custody is "in the child's best interest". What your friend need to do is convince the court that granting him the custody is in the child's best interest, financially and emotionally, in the short run and in the long run.
回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题
It is advisable to check with a local attorney because the family law varies from state to state. In general the parties to a marriage have equal custodial right. There is no preference for mother at law. Of course, the child's attachment to mother will be considered while the court determines the custody issue, but it is not the only or critical facor. In the same way, the child's decision won't be determinative either, but merely a factor the court will take into consideration. The standard for awarding custody is "in the child's best interest". What your friend need to do is convince the court that granting him the custody is in the child's best interest, financially and emotionally, in the short run and in the long run.
所有跟帖:
• 回复:回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题 -litchii- ♀ (123 bytes) () 11/17/2003 postreply 22:52:00
• 回复:回复:回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题 -wal-mart- ♀ (24 bytes) () 11/18/2003 postreply 15:41:00
• 回复:回复:回复:回复:问一个关于离婚后孩子抚养权的问题 -litchii- ♀ (155 bytes) () 11/18/2003 postreply 21:27:00
• 不过老兄,你见过多少案例孩子是判给父亲的?就算你有钱,那就多 -付赡养费好了。- ♀ (14 bytes) () 11/18/2003 postreply 23:47:00
• your presumption is not right -wal-mart- ♀ (253 bytes) () 11/19/2003 postreply 08:26:00
• 回复:your presumption is not right -litchii- ♀ (149 bytes) () 11/19/2003 postreply 15:12:00