Most of pro review say Forest is better, but CR-V is more popula

来源: playForever 2011-05-28 20:59:59 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (691 bytes)
回答: Forester is much better.Dream_Maker2011-05-28 19:25:41

Most of reviews from PRO magazines say that Forest is better. Subaru is better than CR-V in most of aspects(size, performance, and even handling), except Honda name is more popular. Forest is also a popularone (the most popular model among all Subarus). Since most of CR-V parts are shared with Civic(some may be Accord), the availability of parts is higher(more 3rd parties and OEM will make Honda parts). This makes the repair cost lower when the vehicle is old, and resale value is higher(because lower cost to repair).

If you are going to keep the vehicle for a while(8-10 years), I would say go with Forest. CR-V is just too under powered.

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”