小车不安全,IIHS用Accord撞Fit,Camry对撞Yaris,奔驰C撞Smart “The small cars involved in all three tests - the Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit and Smart ForTwo - had already earned top scores for front impact protection in the Institute's standard front impact test in which cars are crashed into a crushable barrier, not another car. ” “That test simulates two cars of roughly equal size hitting almost head-on.” 就是大车安全,小车不安全。IIHS要救美国车了????可惜俺没找到大图,过几天再看吧。 原文链接:http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/14/autos/iihs_small_vs_big/index.htm?postversion=2009041404 http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_33717.aspx
小车不安全,IIHS用Accord撞Fit,Camry对撞Yaris,奔驰C撞Smart (图)
小车不安全,IIHS用Accord撞Fit,Camry对撞Yaris,奔驰C撞Smart “The small cars involved in all three tests - the Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit and Smart ForTwo - had already earned top scores for front impact protection in the Institute's standard front impact test in which cars are crashed into a crushable barrier, not another car. ” “That test simulates two cars of roughly equal size hitting almost head-on.” 就是大车安全,小车不安全。IIHS要救美国车了????可惜俺没找到大图,过几天再看吧。 原文链接:http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/14/autos/iihs_small_vs_big/index.htm?postversion=2009041404 http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_33717.aspx
所有跟帖:
• 真理重复一万遍还是真理。 -1800800- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:07:00
• 重复一万遍,什么都是真理 -coorslight969- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:08:37
• 真的。。。? -1800800- ♂ (78 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:16:33
• 说到30遍的时候,别人就会说 “这人病的不轻了 -internuts- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 19:20:11
• Audi is here !!!!! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 10:21:59
• 还真好使。下次我也对着我的车嚷几嗓子:PORSCHE,PORSCHE,PORSCHE! -1800800- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 16:32:54
• Sorry, still Audi... -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 13:35:59
• 重复一万遍, 没人还在乎真理 -wer188- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:16:38
• how about Camery vs. Buick or Accord vs. Cadillac? -bassman- ♂ (108 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:13:51
• 不明白, 造大车难吗?好像比容易小车。一切取决与生意。 -北航新保理英子- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 18:30:47
• 话又说回来, 任何时候都有大小车, 除非都开一款车 -北航新保理英子- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 18:43:19
• 应该对超过4米长的车征“威胁他人安全”特别税 -MOVEOVER- ♂ (110 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 20:55:15
• 那就没人买车,看肥了谁。 -Grant- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 21:55:52
• 嗯,再对少于3米的征收有碍观瞻费。。。国家大发了~~ -internuts- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 22:03:35
• No car is safe -cys254- ♂ (132 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 20:56:54
• 装甲车,蝙蝠侠的车,应该可以保证安全了在一般路况 -我来自火星- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 21:52:15
• 是,关键还是要看开车的人 -woth- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:50:38
• Accord 和 Camry 也有欺负被人的机会了,不容易。hehe -ISO- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 10:12:42
• It's not the size of the car, stupid! -once4all09- ♂ (529 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:15:13
• 经济不景气,大街上有几个是开超豪华车的?举那些特例干什么? --vip-- ♂ (162 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:32:50
• 回经济不景气doesn't make your gas guzzler safer -once4all09- ♂ (116 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:38:23
• 你以为你做的那些“研究”比LZ的照片更说明问题吗? --vip-- ♂ (65 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:46:11
• What is a "referred journal"??? Lol! -once4all09- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:02:16
• Of course not, the pics appeal to people like urself -once4all09- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:04:57
• 打错了。refereed --vip-- ♂ (270 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:06:43
• 汽车的安全性能不是只靠一个迎头对撞就能测试出来的,要有很多 -woth- ♀ (16 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:52:04
• But "一个迎头对撞" says everything if you are -Audi- ♂ (158 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:05:01
• It is not rocket science -once4all09- ♂ (498 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:15:40
• Then give me an example which a much smaller car -Audi- ♂ (46 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:25:00
• Again, what is more import to you, your car or the life of you a -once4all09- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:32:07
• 又一个“吸能大师”来了!Life for sure...but do you -Audi- ♂ (98 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:37:57
• You don't know why THESE 3 smallish cars were picked -once4all09- ♂ (135 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:43:45
• I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are -Audi- ♂ (203 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:47:44
• 回复:I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are -once4all09- ♂ (219 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:56:34
• It is called Statistics. Well, sorry too much for ur IQ! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:11:59
• Look at this carefully, stupid! "In the case of -Audi- ♂ (389 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:43:58
• Let's just leave it at that -once4all09- ♂ (68 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:51:10
• Yes, yours are unfortunately too low! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:53:31
• BTW, do you really know what does "it's not rocket -Audi- ♂ (76 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:56:46
• 回复:汽车的安全性能不是只靠一个迎头对撞就能测试出来的,要有很多 -once4all09- ♂ (103 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:01:45
• True! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:08:01
• Hey, it's not rocket science either. -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:09:05
• let me just ask you: In those cases, in which cars -Audi- ♂ (102 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:18:30
• 这个图片是OFFSET碰撞,大车被撞的部分刚好是另一边,只能 -sideshowbob- ♀ (64 bytes) () 04/22/2009 postreply 01:38:20
• Audi and once4a1109 -jgsaron- ♂ (143 bytes) () 04/22/2009 postreply 14:17:04