Accredited Investor & etc.

First, I will congratulate Juzi to follow her dream with the action. Why always let other races benefit from financial innovation. Second, everyone just has to be aware this is a high risk alternative investment. It is probably safer for both GP and LP that all LPs are accredited investors. Couple of non-obvious risks are 1. litigation risks due to unsufficient disclsures and false advertisment (hopefully, Juzi has asked a lawyer to review all the materials) 2. Unsufficient protection across individual projects. Separate LLCs may not be good enough if you do not have strict process to prevent co-mingling of the funds. 3. unsufficient documentation of the fund flow. 4. Mixed distributions of fund from different projects. This is the worst situation. All gains from previous distributions are subject to a claw back clause with potential penalties even the project was complete and all funds were distributed. ... The list of risks are long. Both MP and LPS should not treat it lightly.