You are contradictory

来源: QiuMi 于 2012-11-07 20:12:16 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : 0 (946 bytes)
本帖于 2012-11-08 10:25:10 时间, 由普通用户 jy101 编辑

You support government "对新行业，新经济增长点的投入" but against "大政府，政府干预市场"?   So you support and against the same thing!

"政府大部分资源用于保护拯救那些垄断的大财团。美国政府的16T的债务主要都花在这些垄断财团上了" This is bad enough but not the biggest part.  The largest part of government spending is entitlement: Social Security, Medicaid/Madicare, now Obamacare, and welfare,  and Obama stimulus that stimulates nothing.


所有跟帖： 

• 2 cents -WQPY- ♂ 给 WQPY 发送悄悄话 WQPY 的博客首页 (632 bytes) () 11/07/2012 postreply 20:34:15

• Debatable part -QiuMi- ♀ 给 QiuMi 发送悄悄话 (485 bytes) () 11/07/2012 postreply 21:07:01

• "对新行业，新经济增长点的投入" is not "大政府，政府干预市场". -edison11- ♂ 给 edison11 发送悄悄话 edison11 的博客首页 (2920 bytes) () 11/07/2012 postreply 21:16:29

• Just so you know, SS/Medicare has a very strong balance sheet. -老忽叔叔- ♂ 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/08/2012 postreply 01:01:45

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！