One more thing

来源: apt 2012-09-25 14:19:55 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (621 bytes)
回答: That's why I said you may be confusedCyberCat2012-09-25 12:04:16

The matter whether the trust is revocable or irrevocable does not control in child support cases. It is actually very easy to find out whether it is recovable without even knowing the trust instrument by asking the question, who pays for taxes?

The courts in California imposed child support on irrevocable trusts before. See Ventura DCSS v. Brown as trustee. A spendthrift trust by definition is irrevocable. The same as minor's trust or support trust. However, the California courts do not hesitate to collect child support from these trusts. See Lakenan v Lakenan. Right or wrong, that is the state law.

所有跟帖: 

Okay, that's a very bad standard -CyberCat- 给 CyberCat 发送悄悄话 (221 bytes) () 09/25/2012 postreply 14:23:50

回复:Okay, that's a very bad standard -apt- 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (286 bytes) () 09/25/2012 postreply 16:12:46

This is not the law -CyberCat- 给 CyberCat 发送悄悄话 (360 bytes) () 09/26/2012 postreply 07:34:53

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”