刚得到律师的回复:

来源: howlongwaiting 2011-01-13 13:57:47 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (953 bytes)
回答: apt 老师,还有一点需要请教:howlongwaiting2011-01-13 13:23:54
Just want to clarify - you are correct in that the UCCJEA statue you found gives Texas the power to address child custody issues.  However, it does not give Texas the power to address child support.  And the problem we're having in your case is not about child custody, but about child support and medical support.  The only way Texas would have the right to have the power to address the child support and medical support issues is if your hu*****and has lived here during the marriage or he was personally served with the divorce papers while in Texas.  That is why I am hoping that the Court will accept your hu*****and's Answer that was filed with the Court as him agreeing to let Texas address all issues including child support.  That is also why I told you that you need to be prepared to let go of the child support and medical support issues if the Judge will only agree to do the divorce and child custody.  

所有跟帖: 

回复:刚得到律师的回复: -apt- 给 apt 发送悄悄话 apt 的博客首页 (921 bytes) () 01/13/2011 postreply 14:12:55

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”