回复:I said it 'could', not it 'will'

来源: 越王剑 2010-07-06 11:33:39 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (502 bytes)
回答: Let's not draw conclusion like that越王剑2010-07-06 11:20:48
"if one has heavy allocation in gold, the risk of complete portfolio ruin is huge.":

That is true for all assets, not just Gold.

In 2006, people put too much money into real estate (borrowed too much money). In 2000, people put too much money in tech. Now, people put too much money in US treasury.

For Gold, even it can correct big time, it is not over owned at all.

In this world, I haven't seen any new tech stuff can store real value. (Can i-phone store any value?)

所有跟帖: 

回复:the definition of the paradigm shift -越王剑- 给 越王剑 发送悄悄话 (209 bytes) () 07/06/2010 postreply 11:45:52

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”