The law

来源: apt 2006-08-31 11:43:28 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (739 bytes)
You will have a claim of private nuisance if you can prove the barking subtantially and unreasonablly interfered with your use and enjoyment of you land. However, private nuisance can be either intent based or negligence based, and the law applies to people, not dog, so that you must prove that your neighbor intended to interfere or was negligent in control the dog. Frankly, without a special statute to govern such things, your chance to win is slim because you lived under such condition for a year so that even if your neighbor is found negligent, your recovery will still be barred due to assumption of risk.

DO NOT use a camera. That might give your neighbor a claim of invasion of seclusion, of invasion of privacy tort.

所有跟帖: 

回复:The law -sea123- 给 sea123 发送悄悄话 (326 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 13:34:48

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”