回复:谢谢回答。不是换gutter,只是排水槽上的网

来源: apt 2006-07-17 11:18:29 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (1103 bytes)
回答: 回复:老猫,您可以回答我的问题吗?apt2006-07-16 18:56:02
You can not. As I said, you can not introduce evidecen to contradict a written contract. It does not matter whether the contract can be construed as a total integration or not. It will be a different story if you can prove a fraud or misreprensentation. I thought about another possibility if you can introduce the evidence to interopret the contract because it is unclear on what material should be used. You may succeed on this because the contractor wrote the contract (I assumed) so that any unclear parts will be construed against him. This way, you may be able to convince a court to find the contractor a breach. However, it is likely the breach will be found minor because plastic or aluminum, you can not prove which was really better than the other. If it is a minor breach then you must pay. On the other hand, the contractor can argue that there was a mutual mistake because you thought of aluminum and he thought of plastic. He could relied on this to rescind the contact. However, you still need to pay him since he conferred a benefit to you by installing even the plastic one.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”