回复:ZT:请法学专家从法学的角度分析分析:他该不该付赡养费?

来源: law111 2004-03-25 11:06:56 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1061 bytes)
Read this story a couple of times and also noted the comments. Feel uneasy about the change in people's attitude and perception of rightnesss since racing for western living and moral stands. This includes those of us living in U.S. Apparently we have learnt too much of America, its not-so-great aspects rather the others.

No. The law, either Chinese or U.S. common law, has no provisions to order L.D.take care of his biological mother. Certainly there are many and unknown reasons why he and his mom have selected for their course of actions so far, and everyone can interpret the reasons in every way possible. However, we all know what conciouseness is about and what a biological blood connection means. Without forgiveness and the warm heart, we all would live in a cold world full of deception and wrongful deeds. I am sure with time both L.D. and his mother will feel the regretfulness of not looking for a sensible solution but in an emotionless court process. Hope all of us visiting this site will make a note of it.

- Law111

所有跟帖: 

Chinese law? -wal-mart- 给 wal-mart 发送悄悄话 (845 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 12:10:54

回复:Chinese law? -law111- 给 law111 发送悄悄话 (873 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 12:24:35

回复:回复:Chinese law? -wal-mart- 给 wal-mart 发送悄悄话 (768 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:26:52

回复:回复:回复:Chinese law? -law111- 给 law111 发送悄悄话 (1230 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:52:55

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”