请各位大侠帮忙评价一下下面的fund allocation:
(1) US Large Cap 25% [blend 15% (low risk/high return); growth 10% (average risk./average return)]
(2) US Mid Cap Blend 15% (low risk/average return)
(3) US Small Cap Growth 10% (low risk/high return)
(4) International 25% (Asia 15%; Europe 10%. Both are low risk/high return)
(5) Specialty-Health care 10%
(6) Specialty-Global Telecommunication 5%
(7) Specialty-Technology 10%
In addition, what do you think about S&P 500 Index? I like it because of its low expense ratio. However, its morningstar rating is quite low (3 stars) and I am quite uncomfortable choosing any funds with less than 4 stars.
Really appreciate your help.....
请帮忙评价一下My Fund Allocation:
所有跟帖:
•
回复:请帮忙评价一下My Fund Allocation:
-IndependentMind-
♂
(1737 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
07:37:41
•
agree with adding bonds and natural resources
-jas07-
♀
(136 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
07:55:46
•
Thanks. The risk/return assessments are morningstar data
-caren-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
11:50:35
•
回复:Thanks. The risk/return assessments are morningstar data
-IndependentMind-
♂
(76 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
16:27:20
•
回复:请帮忙评价一下My Fund Allocation:
-Short-
♀
(250 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
09:32:33
•
S&P index is attactive because its expense ratio is 0.36
-caren-
♀
(115 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
11:53:03
•
How is your fund company stock performance?
-77ll8-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
11:01:28
•
Some comments:
-dividend_growth-
♀
(690 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
14:19:46
•
Thanks for your recommendations....
-caren-
♀
(92 bytes)
()
07/17/2007 postreply
20:25:21
•
回复:请帮忙评价一下My Fund Allocation:
-forest1972-
♂
(79 bytes)
()
07/19/2007 postreply
17:18:33