有没有发生关系,川普可以去上法庭作证,讲一讲到底发生了什么。
但可以100%,川普不会去作证。 就像他在女作家的案子里,不敢去作证一样。
不过如楼下网友所说,付封口费本身并不违法。检查官是说,伪造商业记录,把帮助竞选的封口费,伪装成律师费,违反了联邦的竞选经费法,以及州的法律。 当然这种事过去发生,没有先例,设计法律解释的问题,比如,如果违反了联邦的竞选经费法,在联邦起诉以前,是否州有权力管这个事。
联邦当年起诉川普的私人律师科恩时,封口费违反联邦竞选法,是罪名之一。 其实在2018年联邦检查官因封口费违法联邦选举财务法起诉川普的私人律师科恩的时候,检控官认为这是非常严重的罪。 "Cohen's crimes are particularly serious because they were committed on the eve of a presidential election and they were intended to affect that election" "In this process, Cohen deceived voting public by hiding alleging facts that he believed would have had a substantial effect on the election."(科恩的罪行特别严重,因为他们是在总统选举前夕犯下的,而且他们的意图是影响选举”“在这个过程中,科恩通过隐瞒他认为会对选举产生重大影响的事实来欺骗投票的公众”) 联邦检查官明确指出,证据证明科恩是受川普指示并和川普一起支付封口费的。 科恩因此坐了3年牢。 从法律上,科恩是从犯。
I used AI to help check the statement from Mitt Romney and the following is the result.
The sentence “I think everybody has made their own assessment of President Trump’s character.” is grammatically correct. It correctly uses the present perfect tense (“has made”) to express an action that happened at an unspecified time before now. The subject “everybody” agrees with the verb “has made”. The possessive adjective “their” is used correctly to refer back to “everybody”. So, no grammatical errors in this sentence. Good job!
Bill Clinton did this while he was president inside the white house, he denied at the beginning... Eventually he did not get removed from the white house.
这么明摆着的事,只有川粉看不出来